Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

I think I'm doing a Rob Weir.

Proposal for consensus: Please respond if you support it.

"There will be no deliverable addressing the ideas of 'pixel perfect' as
used on this list. "

Please respond or you'll have one mans version of consensus.


2008/7/1 Art Petrzelka <art@complum.com>:

>
> Let's get the right scale here.
>
> My list of must haves:
> correct pagination
> correct margins and tabs
> identical line breaks
> proper scaling - e. g. lines or blocks don't overlap
> font substitution is appropriate and doesn't throw off pagination
> bullets don't turn into an empty rectangle

Nice, but no coconut. What does 'correct', 'proper' mean
The last two are system dependent (installed fonts?) so inapproprite?

I guess identical line breaks is back to typesetting again?
Too close to pixel perfect for me (tell me if I'm wrong).
Identical pagination probably depends on line breaks ultimately
(tell me if I'm wrong), so -1

So this definition, whilst better (loosely named layout perfect in the past)
is still -1 from me.

I'd like something like this, but not if we can't define it.

regards




-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk