Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Value and danger of extensions

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

2008/7/11 jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com>:

> OK, extensions that are "good" should not be zapped. "Good" is based on documentation/standardization.
>There may be a  central registry approach or lookup to find such documentation.

Your definition of good might match mine, it is unlikely to match a commercial
organisations definition, seeking commercial gain in the market place.





>> I found http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/page2.html
>> very good,
>> although the paper version is better for reference.
>> The schema is possibly the worst part of ODF IMHO.
>
> I think the link you provided is what I was looking for. I don't have quick access to my regular desktop, so I tried googling and took a guess. Thanks. I think that's that book I had in mind. .. So its title is simply, "RELAX NG".


Yes, Eric is a good writer, it covers most of what is needed. My paper
copy is very well used :-)

regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk