[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Firewall Profile: Start and stop actions
All,
QUESTION ONE:
I
am suggesting that we remove the ‘start’ and ‘stop’ actions from this profile. Do you think
we need to include the start and/or stop actions
in the 'stateless-packet-filtering' (aka firewall) profile?
QUESTION TWO:
If you believe that the
start and/or stop actions
are applicable to the firewall profile, please identify if
they should be required, optional and suggested target type(s) BACKGROUND:
The following is NOT consensus attained from the actuator profile subcommittee nor any subset of the subcommittee. The following is my personal opinion only and request confirmation
or rebuttal. In the context of the stateless-packet-filtering:
I do not see the utility of including
these two actions in this profile.
A ‘start’ or ‘stop’ action makes sense when you have a device that has multiple options, functions, tasks, processes etc. but this particular actuator is essentially a single purpose device, so short of taking the firewall offline, what would one ‘start’ or
‘stop’? Also, I suspect that it would be a rare event indeed to essentially take the firewalls completely offline.
Should we leave out
these actions for now?
They can always be added later should we learn from our early implementers that it is in fact needed. Please advise VR Joe B |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]