Did anyone respond to Mr. Rome in this matter? If not, would oyu like me to run point?
From: openc2-lang@lists.oasis-open.org <openc2-lang@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of Brian Berliner
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 9:50 AM
To: duncan sfractal.com <duncan@sfractal.com>
Cc: openc2-lang <openc2-lang@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [openc2-lang] Fwd: mistake inside oc2ls-v1.0-cs02
There are a lot more numbers than â21â missing in the Action table. We removed some early actions from the table before we released the final version. I also thought that it looked weird that we didnât re-number the table to make it perfectly
sequential, but in reality they are just identifiers and it doesnât matter what the number is... but the number assigned in the table should never change.
For all of us currently, we use JSON, so the numbers are not even used at all, so this is reserved for when we add binary encodings.
So, yes. 21 is missing (and lots of others). That is weird, but by design, and it actually doesnât matter that they are not perfectly sequential in the table.... Except for the fact that I had to just write this exactly because they are
not perfectly sequential in the finals spec!
The attached email went to the public comments email. Since I am not sure everyone monitors that channel, I am forwarding to LSC to look at
iPhone, iTypo, iApologize
I'm currently reading the specification and try to make my own python implementation and I found that :
In page 29 of the oc2ls-v1.0-cs02
The number "21" is miss inside the board
--
|