[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [office-comment] Foreign elements and attributes
2009/3/1 <robert_weir@us.ibm.com>: > Jesper Lund Stocholm <4a4553504552@gmail.com> wrote on 03/01/2009 03:57:16 > PM: > >> >> Microsoft, could you elaborate a bit on why the extended conformance >> class is not acceptable to you? >> > > Not to put too much of a damper on this discussion. I'm as guilty as > anyone here in misusing this list recently. But would it be possible to > reconvene this discussion over on the opendocuemnt-users list? Yes - I'll x-post this reply to the users-list. > It is unmoderated and open to all. You can subscribe here: > http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ > > We should really be using the office-comment list exclusively for feedback > on the published ODF standard or public review drafts. This will > naturally include clarification questions regarding feedback. But if we > start engaging in multi-day discussions then it is best to migrate over to > the opendocuemnt-users list. We can all pontificate to our heart's > content over there. I agree :o) And I'll re-iterate my question to Microsoft here: To vendors: "why is it not 'good enough' to have your documents conform to the 'OpenDocument extended conformance class' when your documents contain extensions? -- Jesper Lund Stocholm www.idippedut.dk SC34/WG4 http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/wg4/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]