Re: [orms] Proposal to move charter changes forward

[Peter Davis <peter.davis@neustar.biz>]

comment on the revised version of the charter:

I thought we had discussed and agreed to move the 'Security, threats  
and Risk analysis' to be concurrent with the 'Protocol(s) for  
exchanging of reputation...'
  specification.  If that was the case, then this draft does not  
reflect that consensus

=peterd


On May 7, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:

> After consulting with the OASIS Staff, Here are steps suggested to  
> resolve the Charter Issues from the F2F
>
> 1. Prepare a change-marked version of the charter, see attached
> (See attached file: OASIS Open Reputation Management Systems  
> Charter Updates.doc)
>
> 2. Hold a vote to determine whether or not the majority of the TC  
> thinks the changes expand the scope of the charter.
>
> a.       If yes, conduct a ballot to determine if the TC wants to  
> recharter
> b.      If no, conduct a ballot to determine if the TC wants to  
> clarify its charter
>
> 3.       In either case, OASIS would then need to conduct Special  
> Majority ballots (web-based) to approve either change
> 4.       Those who feel the wrong step was taken have the ability  
> to appeal the decision to the TC Administrator.
>
>  For reference, here’s the section in the TC Process on rechartering:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ 
> process-2008-02-05.php#rechartering
>
> and the section on clarifying the charter:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ 
> process-2008-02-05.php#charterClarification
>
> Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122<OASIS Open  
> Reputation Management Systems Charter  
> Updates.doc>---------------------------------------------------------- 
> -----------
>
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs  
> in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php