Re: [oslc-core] Agenda for this week's OSLC CORE TC meeting

[Martin P Pain <martinpain@uk.ibm.com>]

(Oops, I sent the previous message by accident.
Here's the full version)

As I also cannot attend the meeting,
here are my votes. (I've included Nick's ones from his previous email for
ease of reference):

issue
23 - Should a ServiceProviderCatalog or ServiceProvider be an LDPC?
Nick: +1 for the current proposal.
Martin: I do not believe this is ready to be voted on,
as it needs more fleshing out as to how it would work.

issue
29 - Allow for selection dialogs for service providers
Nick: +1 for the current proposal.
Martin: +1 for the current proposal.

issue 9 - Bootstrapping discovery
Nick: 0 (not really against this, but not convinced it's of great value)
Martin: +1 for my own proposal (just added a comment replying
to the alternative proposal).

issue 15 - Allow client to request different icon sizes for resource preview
Nick: +1 for the proposal with the change suggested by me in comment https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-15?focusedCommentId=60556&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-60556
Martin: We need to consider the IANA implications of using
an "iconSize" parameter on the "return=representation"
preference. See comment in JIRA.

issue 20 - Service provider should describe domain/scope
Nick: -1 on the proposal as currently written, +1 on the wording provided
by David - see my comments in the issue.
Martin:
+1 for "A URL of a resource that MUST provide additional
information about the service provider."
-1 for "application/rdf+xml MUST be supported"
and "The RDF representation of the resource MUST include one dcterms:title
statement and one or more rdf:type statements"
(I support making the oslc:detail predicate more flexible,
but for me the proper solution to this problem is making the project area
resource and SP resource into the same resource. See comment in JIRA.)

Martin Pain
Software Developer - Green Hat
Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel

E-mail: martinpain@uk.ibm.com Find me on:  and within IBM on:

IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in
England and Wales with number 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North
Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU 



From:      
 Nick Crossley <ncrossley@us.ibm.com>
To:      
 "Sarabura, Martin"
<msarabura@ptc.com>, oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:      
 18/08/2015 17:51
Subject:    
   Re: [oslc-core]
Agenda for this week's OSLC CORE TC meeting
Sent by:    
   <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

I cannot attend the meeting (out on
vacation this week), but here are my votes on the issues noted in the agenda:
issue
23 - Should a ServiceProviderCatalog or ServiceProvider be an LDPC?
Nick: +1 for the current proposal.

issue
29 - Allow for selection dialogs for service providers
Nick: +1 for the current proposal.

issue 9 - Bootstrapping discovery
Nick: 0 (not really against this, but not convinced it's of great value)

issue 15 - Allow client to request different icon sizes for resource preview
Nick: +1 for the proposal with the change suggested by me in comment https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-15?focusedCommentId=60556&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-60556

issue 20 - Service provider should describe domain/scope
Nick: -1 on the proposal as currently written, +1 on the wording provided
by David - see my comments in the issue.

Because I have been out this week and last week, I have not yet addressed my action item of writing up a scenario for how to determine the usage of a particular LDPC.

Nick.

"Sarabura, Martin" ---08/18/2015 09:31:47 AM---There are a few issues that Jim and I feel are close to ready for a vote; they are listed on the age

From: "Sarabura, Martin" <msarabura@ptc.com>
To: "OASIS (oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org)" <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 08/18/2015 09:31 AM
Subject: [oslc-core] Agenda for this week's OSLC CORE TC meeting
Sent by: <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

There are a few issues that Jim and I feel are close to ready for a vote;
they are listed on the agenda:
https://wiki.oasis-open.org/oslc-core/Meetings/Telecon2015.08.20
 
Please review these issues to help prepare for the meeting on Thursday.
 
Regards,
 
Martin Sarabura
R&D Fellow, PTC
 


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU