[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: OSLC CORE TC Minutes February 18, 2016
Attendees
Regrets
Resolutions
·
Accepted recommendation in
issue 39
·
Defer
issue 58 Actions
·
Jim to email Martin P to see if
issue 44 can be closed.
·
Jim to contact Ian Green and Martin Pain re
issue 40 to see if there are any changes required from their viewpoint.
·
David: To write proposed resolution to
issue 60 Chat transcript from room: oslc [07:06] David Honey (IBM): David volunteered as scribe
[07:06] David Honey (IBM): List of attendees: David Honey (IBM), Harish (Software AG), Jad El-khoury (KTH), Jean-Luc Johnson (Airbus), Jim Amsden (IBM), Martin Sarabura (PTC),
Nick Crossley (IBM) [07:06] Martin Sarabura (PTC):
https://wiki.oasis-open.org/oslc-core/Meetings/Telecon2016.02.04
[07:07] David Honey (IBM): Approval of Feb 4 minutes, accepted.
[07:07] David Honey (IBM): Next meeting Mar 3rd.
[07:08] David Honey (IBM): Versioned types issue, David emailed Nick, Nick yet to review.
[07:09] Martin Sarabura (PTC):
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-43
[07:10] David Honey (IBM): Nick: Not yet done on issue 43. Won't have time to work on it over next 2 weeks.
[07:10] David Honey (IBM): Nick: Don't think it is critical for public review.
[07:12] David Honey (IBM): Nick: One column in shape table(s) is meaningless.
[07:12] David Honey (IBM): Needs work on Respec.
[07:15] David Honey (IBM): Nick: Changes to accomodate Jim's requirement are possible, but unlikely to be in next 2 weeks.
[07:16] David Honey (IBM):
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-39 ready for a vote
[07:17] David Honey (IBM): Old impact terms, do they need to be included as archaic?
[07:18] David Honey (IBM): Old terms were not in an obvious published vocabulary. So doesn't need to be included as archaic.
[07:20] David Honey (IBM): Vote to accept proposed resolution to
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-39
[07:20] David Honey (IBM): Martin seconded
[07:20] Nick Crossley (IBM): +1
[07:20] Jim Amsden (IBM)3: +1
[07:20] Martin Sarabura (PTC): +1
[07:20] Harish (Software AG): +1
[07:20] Jean-Luc Johnson (Airbus): +1
[07:20] David Honey (IBM): +1
[07:21] David Honey (IBM): Vote passed.
[07:21] Martin Sarabura (PTC):
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-45
[07:21] Martin Sarabura (PTC): Use of oslc:range, especially for enumerations, is unclear
[07:23] David Honey (IBM): Nick: There is an IBM tool requiring is oslc:range. There are cases where it is a valid, and useful to have range rather than allowed values (enumerations).
[07:25] David Honey (IBM): Nick: For enumerations, it is worth adding. For others, perhaps little value.
[07:32] David Honey (IBM): David: oslc:range is required for enumeration members to be expressed in terms meaningful to users.
[07:33] David Honey (IBM): Nick: Can we reword oslc:range to be less strict? Does that introduce compatibility concerns? Existing clients who are strict can continue to be
strict. [07:33] David Honey (IBM): Jim: Update description of oslc:range. Review range values. Email the result for review and further discussion.
[07:34] David Honey (IBM): Jim: Agreed as action item.
[07:35] Jim Amsden (IBM)3: consider weakening the description of range. [ ] create an inventory of properties with proposed range values and [ ] email summary then decide next
meeting [07:37] David Honey (IBM):
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-44
[07:37] David Honey (IBM): Jim will email Martin to see if issue 44 can be closed.
[07:38] David Honey (IBM):
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-60 still open.
[07:38] Jim Amsden (IBM)3:
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-16
[07:38] David Honey (IBM):
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-16 can be closed.
[07:39] David Honey (IBM):
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-47
[07:40] David Honey (IBM): Jim: ready to close?
[07:43] David Honey (IBM): Nick: Don't think it is an issue.
[07:45] David Honey (IBM):
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-58 needs discussion, proposal, and a VOTE
[07:47] David Honey (IBM): Nick: xsd:date versus xsd:dateTime is a weak case for adding data types.
[07:48] David Honey (IBM): Duration is a stronger case.
[07:48] David Honey (IBM): Nick: Needs more through review of data types with experts, and we don't have time to do that now.
[07:53] David Honey (IBM): David, Nick: Concerns about interoperability with OSLC 2 clients.
[07:54] David Honey (IBM): Proposal to defer.
[07:54] David Honey (IBM): Wait for comments in public review.
[07:54] Nick Crossley (IBM): +1
[07:54] David Honey (IBM): Nick: seconded
[07:54] Jim Amsden (IBM)3: +1
[07:54] David Honey (IBM): +1
[07:54] Jad El-khoury (KTH): +1
[07:54] Martin Sarabura (PTC): +1
[07:54] Jean-Luc Johnson (Airbus): +1
[07:55] Harish (Software AG): +1
[07:55] David Honey (IBM): Carried.
[07:57] David Honey (IBM): Jim: To work through Nick's reviews.
[07:57] David Honey (IBM): Jim Will update
https://wiki.oasis-open.org/oslc-core/FrontPage#Working_Documents
[07:57] David Honey (IBM): Can have an email vote
[07:58] David Honey (IBM): Nick: will complete resource shape review.
[08:00] David Honey (IBM): Review of core vocab.
[08:00] David Honey (IBM): oslc:archived still serves a purpose.
[08:00] David Honey (IBM): dcterms:creator - should the range be Agent or foaf:Person
[08:01] Nick Crossley (IBM): Had to drop
[08:01] David Honey (IBM): Keep foaf:Person for compatibility with existing implementations.
[08:02] David Honey (IBM):
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OSLCCORE-40
[08:03] David Honey (IBM): Jim: Will contact Ian Green and Martin Pain to see if there are any changes required from their viewpoint.
[08:06] David Honey (IBM): Jim: Not OSLC's job to describe general web security. Click-jacking is specific to OSLC delegated dialogs.
[08:08] Harish (Software AG): Have to drop now.
[08:09] David Honey (IBM): Martin: Is worth mentioning as guidance. Should discuss with Martin Pain since he had input to discussion.
[08:09] David Honey (IBM): Jim: Proposal is to remove discussion of click-jacking, and need to address standard web security issues unless OSLC introduces specific ones.
[08:11] David Honey (IBM): Jim: Don't think vote is needed since text in spec was non-normative.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]