[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: OSLC CORE TC Minutes Aug 3, 2017
Scribe
Attendees
Regrets
Resolutions
Actions
Chat transcript from room: oslc [07:06] ian green: ian will scribe [07:06] Martin Sarabura (PTC): https://wiki.oasis-open.org/oslc-core/Meetings/Telecon2017.07.20 [07:07] ian green: minutes accepted [07:08] ian green: next meeting aug 17. Martin cannot attend. Need to discuss whether we will hold that call. [07:09] ian green: action items: Jim (send note re consolidation). Chet is in agreement. Rainer suggest we retain current TCs, as this avoids need to change existing documents/urls etc. [07:10] ian green: We could have a joint meeting, w/ combined agenda [07:10] ian green: cross-joining would make it easier to deal with voting rights [07:12] ian green: Nick has concern that Chet and others might have issues with formal minutes [07:13] ian green: Martin suggests time-slicing a meeting [07:13] ian green: Agreed we need to discuss with Chet. [07:14] ian green: Jim asking for vote on whether core tc members want shared meeting [07:15] ian green: resolution: proposal is to schedule joint meeting with core, domains and change and config mgmt to have joint weekly meetings [07:16] ian green: seconded by Martin [07:20] ian green: Discussion that additional steps might be desirable to further reduce overhead of multiple tcs [07:21] Jim Amsden: +1 [07:21] Nick Crossley (IBM): +1 [07:22] ian green: +1 [07:22] Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): +1 [07:22] Martin Sarabura (PTC): +1 [07:22] ian green: carried [07:23] ian green: resolution (Jim): propose config management is moved into core tc [07:25] ian green: resolution (Jim): propose that config management spec & related documents be accepted into core tc [07:25] Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): +1 [07:26] ian green: seconded by Martin [07:26] Nick Crossley (IBM): +1 [07:26] ian green: +1 [07:26] Martin Sarabura (PTC): +1 [07:26] Andrew Berezovskyi (KTH): +1 [07:28] ian green: It would be desirable to accept some selected historic states of these specs/documents. entire history is not necessary [07:31] Jim Amsden: +1 [07:32] ian green: carried [07:32] ian green: action items (Nick, TRS spec edits) [07:34] ian green: Discussion of particular wording in the TRS spec. [07:38] ian green: Nick: should TRS discovery-related triples be introduced in a core spec update, eg as part of service discovery? [07:40] ian green: Current wording is incomplete because nothing is defined. Either reword or improve core spec. [07:52] ian green: Action item (Andrew) : provide zip file. Andrew confirms this has been done [07:52] ian green: Acton (Jim) : prep spec for initial review. Not finished [07:56] ian green: Andrew: need to assess effort to update oslc4j to oslc3. Jim suggests alternative approach based on his js-based approach [07:56] ian green: Jim asking the general q - where do we want to invest our efforts? [08:01] ian green: Nick (TRS) - what was our decision/conclusion on trspath/ldpatch. Similarly for paging. [08:01] ian green: (correction patch, not path) [08:01] ian green: Jim: it's trspatch [08:03] ian green: next meeting 17th aug
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]