oslc-core message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Fw: [oslc-core] TC meeting 6th Sep
- From: David Honey1 <DavidHoney@uk.ibm.com>
- To: "OASIS OSLC Core TC Discussion List (oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org)" <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:42:49 +0100
Was oslc.properties discussed in the meeting
on 6th Sep, and if so, was a decision reached?
----- Forwarded by David
Honey1/UK/Contr/IBM on 10/09/2018 11:41 -----
From:
David Honey1 <DavidHoney@uk.ibm.com>
To:
"OASIS OSLC Core
TC Discussion List" <oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:
05/09/2018 09:26
Subject:
[oslc-core]
TC meeting 6th Sep
Sent by:
<oslc-core@lists.oasis-open.org>
I won't be attending the TC meeting
tomorrow, Thu 6th Sep, as I'm out on vacation.
I have edited the OSLC Query 3.0 spec covering the review comments. Only
one issue remains...
The query spec references oslc.properties when describing the syntax of
oslc.select to avoid duplicating the syntax across two documents. Should
the specification omit describing oslc.properties because there doesn't
appear to be a good use case for it with query, or should it be explained
with a clearer explanation including an example?
I forwarded Arthur's reply to my email.
If that can be discussed and a decision reached this week, I should be
able to edit the query spec accordingly and deliver those changes before
the meeting on the 13th Sep.
Best regards,
David
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]