[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Adding conformance class markers
Servers
MUST implement,
and SHOULDdocument, one of the following semantics: [QUERY-29]
|
rdf:XMLLiteral | An
XMLLiteral, such as "abc"^^rdf:XMLLiteral,
MUST be supported.
A server MAYtreat the literal in the same way as a plain string literal with the data
type removed such as "abc".
[QUERY-24] A plain string literal, such as "abc"MUST be supported. A server MAYtreat the literal in the same way as an XML literal string such as "abc"^^rdf:XMLLiteral. [QUERY-25] An xsd:string typed literal, such as "abc"^^xsd:string, MUST be supported. A server MAYtreat the literal in the same way as an XML literal string such as "abc"^^rdf:XMLLiteral. [QUERY-26] Servers MAYvalidate the string for compliance to the XMLLiteral standard. [QUERY-27] | The
operators =,
!=,
and inMUST be supported.
[QUERY-28] Servers MUSTimplement, and SHOULDdocument, one of the following semantics: [QUERY-29]
Other operators MAYbe supported and MAYhave implementation-dependent semantics. A server MAYreport such usage as unsupported. [QUERY-31] |
However, in the conformance section, these are quoted out of context, so
not very meaningfull.
For example:
QUERY-31 | Other operators MAYbe supported and MAYhave implementation-dependent semantics. A server MAYreport such usage as unsupported. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]