[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [oslc-promcode] Version Control Commit by f-jiang
Kaz, You asked: > * Should we also add shapes for ems:Metric and ems:UnitOfMeasure? > - originally, they were outside of our spec, so I didn't make > shapes for them nor range definition to their inbound links We don't need shapes for ems:Metric and ems:UnitOfMeasure because they don't have any properties. They are just used to tag URIs as identifying metrics and units of measure. > - similarly on ems:Measure, but we had corresponding resource > inside of our spec, so now we have its shape > Yes, we need a shape for ems:Measure because it has four properties. > * Should we change to promcode:scopeItemSizeMetric? > - your suggestion sounds reasonable in case if we include > ems:Metric to the spec > Yes, I recommend that change but we should get agreement from the TC. Perhaps we can do this my email vote? -- Arthur Ryman
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]