[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: [pkcs11] Groups - Ballot reminders: 6
Guys, Just following up on these proposals. I’ve reviewed each and all but one are relatively non-contentious and minimally invasive. So my recommendation is to
vote YES on all of these, with the exception of Revised DSA mechanism proposal,
*yet*. I do like this proposal and think it is necessary to enable DSA functions for domain parameter and key sizes other than 1024/160. This proposal does impact
backwards compatibility, but is necessary to support DSA in today’s applications in a standard way. The only reason I am hesitating is that the author made a comment on the voting page which indicates that there is still some ambiguity in the specification,
so I’m awaiting clarification from him on this. Once I receive that clarification, I will let you know how I believe the vote should go. As it turns out, I will be out of the office for the next week and a half, so I will not be here for vote close – so please, cast your votes when you get a
chance as there will likely be no more reminders from me. Thanks, Bob From: workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of tc_admin@oasis-open.org Reminder: Please cast your vote on the ballot "RSA AES Secure Key Import proposal" in the "OASIS PKCS 11 TC" group.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]