[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [pkcs11] Proposal: CKM_AES_XCBC_MAC and CKM_AES_XCBC_MAC_96
As mentioned before I generally have a
problem with extra mechanisms to deal with truncated MAC values.
But if this goes to ballot, I won't oppose it.
I do wish we could come up with a general agreement on whether these will be permitted or not. Maybe a separate ballot on that particular topic? Mike On 7/31/2013 5:00 PM, Oscar K So Jr. wrote: Proposal: CKM_AES_XCBC_MAC and CKM_AES_XCBC_MAC_96 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]