[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: XMSS (MT) Proposal without NIST Parameters
Hi Philip, is the definition of the XMSSMT public key object in section 1.1.3 correct? It seems that the XMSSMT public key is just the parameter specification? IMO there is something missing here. In general, we might think about a general CKA_KEY_PARAMS attribute instead of defining a new CKA_<keytype>_PARAMS for every new key type. CKA_VALUE is also used for most public and private keys and we’re not introducing
new CKA_<keytype>_VALUE attributes. Regards, Daniel From: pkcs11@lists.oasis-open.org <pkcs11@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of Philip Lafrance Greetings all, Attached is a version of the XMSS proposal with all references of the NSIT SP removed.
Best regards, Philip Lafrance Utimaco IS GmbH Germanusstr. 4, D.52080 Aachen, Germany, Tel: +49-241-1696-0, www.utimaco.com Seat: Aachen – Registergericht Aachen HRB 18922 VAT ID No.: DE 815 496 496 Managementboard: Stefan Auerbach (Chairman) CEO, Malte Pollmann CSO, Martin Stamm CFO This communication is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the email. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]