[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: The TPKI "watershed" issue
Sorry for the abundance of messages, but the
following message should IMHO be of interest to the whole group.
Essentially one simple question will determine
how the rest of the TPKI project will be.
The "watershed" issue is:
Is the anticipated TPKI mechanism supposed to work
IDENTICALLY in the targeted leading
browsers? This would imply no less
than a STANDARDS EFFORT.
Or is the goal rather to find out what the
various browsers in their current versions
can do in terms signing and encryption? This is a MARKET RESEARCH project. Given the plugin constraint (no ActiveX
etc) in the current TPKI draft, this can
be done in a month or so.
If OTOH, the 50+
plugin schemes are to be included, this is a MAJOR effort. Much of the information is in foreign languages, poorly
documented, and often NDA protected. The latter for example is always the
case for schemes created by the financial sector. The biopharma
industries' USSI is currently also NDA protected.
Since there are only two voting members in the
AGSC, and the rest are mainly passive members, I
suggest a "straw poll" to get some indications of
what other people think of this. If there is no or few response, I
don't think that we have to bother much
about ANY TPKI issue :-)
Also, I would like to know how much the
"wiz-kid" is supposed to work for this SC and if
possible who he or she is.
thanx
Anders |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]