Representing parts Issue RBN-13

[Tim Turner <tjt@lsc.co.uk>]

Title: Representing parts Issue RBN-13

In the interest of visibility My response & comments to the issue are provided below

Issue: RBN-13 by Rob Bodington (05-07-27) minor_technical issue

Should the part_version and Part view definition have an assigned id or should the id attribute be used?

TJT Response: As version code identifiers for a part and their respective view definitions may also change over time we should use an assigned id. This will then be consistent with how we treat identifiers as described in C001.

Any additional comments welcome.

regards,
Tim

*************************************************************************
*
* Mr. Timothy J. Turner BSC(Hons) MSc, MBCS
* Executive Consultant, Enterprise Integration Technologies
* LSC Group, Lincoln House, Wellington Crescent, Fradley Park, LICHFIELD, Staffordshire WS13 8RZ, ENGLAND
* UK Switchboard: +44-1543 446800 Fax: +44-1543 446900
* US Direct telephone: +1-803-327 2829 (Rock Hill)
* Mobile (US) telephone: +1-843-4759179
* Mobile (UK) telephone: +44-7885-393225
* e-mail: tjt@lsc.co.uk <mailto:tjt@lsc.co.uk> Internet: <http://www.lsc.co.uk/>
*
*************************************************************************

DISCLAIMER: ***SECURITY LABEL: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED***   The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised.  If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.  Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. This e-mail originates from LSC Group. Registered in England & Wales No 2275471 Registered Office: Devonport Royal Dockyard, Devonport, Plymouth, PL1 4SG