RE: [plcs-dex] Representing parts Issue RBN-13

["Hendrix, Thomas E" <thomas.e.hendrix@boeing.com>]

PDM UG says for product.id  make an organization assignment to the product, with role of id owner. The product_version.id would presumable have the same owner. Usually this would be the design owner.  Additional identifiers are added with applied_id_assignment; which themselves are qualified with an applied_organization_assignment.  Then the organization ids are correlated... Does this work?

Regards,

Tom

Thomas E. Hendrix
Phone: 206-544-5276
thomas.e.hendrix@boeing.com


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Per-Åke Ling [mailto:per-ake.ling@eurostep.com] 
>Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 7:57 AM
>To: Tim Turner
>Cc: DEXS-PLCS-OASIS (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: [plcs-dex] Representing parts Issue RBN-13
>
>
>There is a problem with the ids on part_version: Consider a part 
>identified with XYZ4711, an three part_versions connected to 
>it: v1, v2 
>and v3:
>
>part:  <----------------------+---- part_version
>id: XYZ4711                   |     id: v1
>                               |     part_version
>                               +---- id: v2
>                               |     part_version
>                               +---- id: v3
>
>However, in PLCS there is no way to relate the ids so we cannot 
>establish which version id goes with which part id:
>
>Multiple ids:
>
>part:  <--------------------------- part_version
>id: XYZ4711                         id: v1
>id: ABC13                           id: 1.0
>id: 04517                           id: A1
>
>There is no way to show that the complete id is XYZ4711 v1, ABC13 A1, 
>and 04517 1.0 as opposed to e.g. ABC13 v1. An obvious but annoying 
>solution is to write the full id for the part, e.g. 'XYZ4711 
>v1', but it 
>is not only redundant, it is also counterintuitive as the _part_ is 
>XYZ411 and the _version_ is v1, not 'XYZ4711 v1'.
>
>Unfortunatey I cannot see a way around this.
>
>Regards,
>Per-Åke Ling
>
>Tim Turner wrote:
>> In the interest of visibility My response & comments to the issue are
>> provided below
>> 
>> *Issue: RBN-13 by Rob Bodington (05-07-27) minor_technical issue*
>> 
>> Should the part_version and Part view definition have an assigned id 
>> or
>> should the id attribute be used?
>> 
>> *TJT Response:* As version code identifiers for a part and their
>> respective view definitions may also change over time we 
>should use an 
>> assigned id. This will then be consistent with how we treat 
>identifiers 
>> as described in C001.
>> 
>> Any additional comments welcome.
>> 
>> regards,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>**********************************************************************
>> ***
>> *
>> * Mr. Timothy J. Turner BSC(Hons) MSc, MBCS
>> * Executive Consultant, Enterprise Integration Technologies
>> * LSC Group, Lincoln House, Wellington Crescent, Fradley Park, 
>> LICHFIELD, Staffordshire WS13 8RZ, ENGLAND
>> * UK Switchboard: +44-1543 446800 Fax: +44-1543 446900
>> * US Direct telephone: +1-803-327 2829 (Rock Hill)
>> * Mobile (US) telephone: +1-843-4759179
>> * Mobile (UK) telephone: +44-7885-393225
>> * e-mail:_ __tjt@lsc.co.uk <mailto:tjt@lsc.co.uk>_ Internet:_ 
>> <http://www.lsc.co.uk/>_
>> *
>> 
>***************************************************************
>**********
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *DISCLAIMER: ***SECURITY LABEL: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED***   The 
>> information in this message is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this 
>> message by anyone else is unauthorised.  If you are not the intended 
>> recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the 
>message, or 
>> any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is 
>prohibited and 
>> may be unlawful.  Please immediately contact the sender if you have 
>> received this message in error. This e-mail originates from 
>LSC Group. 
>> Registered in England & Wales No 2275471 Registered Office: 
>Devonport 
>> Royal Dockyard, Devonport, Plymouth, PL1 4SG *
>> 
>> 
>
>
>-- 
>========================================================
>Per-Åke Ling         email: per-ake.ling_AT_eurostep.com   .~.
>Eurostep AB          mobile: +46 709 566 490              / v \
>Vasagatan 38         http://www.eurostep.com             /( _ )\
>SE-111 20 Stockholm                                        ^ ^
>