[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [plcs-dex] Implementer guidance
Agree Regards Leif -----Original Message----- From: Nigel Shaw [mailto:nigel.shaw@eurostep.com] Sent: den 16 januari 2006 10:07 To: plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [plcs-dex] Implementer guidance There are multiple possible interpretation of "$" whilst /IGNORE has a defined meaning. Therefore send "/IGNORE" would be my preference. As examples, "$" can be interpreted as "there is no value", "I do not know the value", "I know the value but do not want to tell you", "you are not allowed to know the value",... Nigel -----Original Message----- From: Barker, Sean (UK) [mailto:sean.barker@baesystems.com] Sent: 16 January 2006 08:47 To: plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [plcs-dex] Implementer guidance I am resolving an issue on the implementer guidance for /IGNORE. Attribute values are set to '/IGNORE' when the information that could be held by the attribute will be instead assigned to the instance of the entity. Note: required attributes will always have an equivalent assigned, whereas optional attributes need not be assigned. While this describes how to populate instance diagrams, the question arises, what happens in the physical file. That is, should an unpopulated optional attribute contain the value "$" or "/IGNORE"? Sean Barker 0117 302 8184 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ********************************************************************
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]