[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [plcs-dex] date effectivity
What about using the start date of the next higher assembly? This would make an assumption that the part was on the original assembly when put into service. Thoughts?
From: Gordon Robb
[mailto:gor@lsc.co.uk]
Hi, I would suggest that your option in respect to a feedback activity classification is the CORRECT one. There could be thousands of components on a aircraft or any other product that the fitted date is not known. Zero filling or a dummy date is of little value.
Gordon
DISCLAIMER: ***SECURITY LABEL: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED*** The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. This e-mail originates from LSC Group. Registered in England & Wales No 2275471 Registered Office: Devonport Royal Dockyard, Devonport, Plymouth, PL1 4SG |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]