RE: [plcs-dex] Vico ISO Meeting

I had not planned on attending the meeting – having said that a meeting on reference data is a good idea, and I also think that the TOG needs to meet (though not necessarily face to face).

Perhaps we should try for a webex to discuss the reference data.

It would probably be cheaper to have a meeting away from the Sc4 meeting – that way we do not have to pay meeting fees.

Regards
Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Turner [mailto:tjt@lsc.co.uk]
Sent: 23 February 2006 01:04
To: 'plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: [plcs-dex] Vico ISO Meeting

All,

I am currently evaluating attendance at Vico.

I think it would be useful to meet if we have enough of the core-team & reference data people attending for another face-to-face.

I would like to discuss DEX 4 reference data and I have concluded that trying to achieve this over the phone would not be ideal.

On the other hand, it might also be a good time for the TOG to re-assess life since the previous TOG meeting in UK & to discuss direction & developments since then.

Suggestions received so far indicate that maybe running a meeting in parallel might be reasonable, over Mon-Wed; with Mon & Tue for reference data and Wed for a short TOG.

I will need to make decisions in the next few days.

Regards
Tim
NB Other dates/venues also considered.

-----Original Message-----
From: mats.nilsson@fmv.se [mailto:mats.nilsson@fmv.se]
Sent: 15 February 2006 03:15
To: sean.barker@baesystems.com; plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [plcs-dex] Reference Data Annotation Properties

All,

I don't have any proposed answers to Sean's questions, but the questions do (in my opinion) again point out the need for a clear definition of how Reference Data should be specified.

I once again (...) attach my first draft (built on Rob's documentation in DEXlib) for such a specification (which of course should be re-entered into DEXlib when finalized), in hope that someone will read and comment upon it... ;o)

I will attend the ISO-meeting in Vico Equence. If anyone else is, I propose a meeting regarding Reference Data during that week.

Regards,
Mats - FMV

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Barker, Sean (UK) [mailto:sean.barker@baesystems.com]
Skickat: den 14 februari 2006 17:30
Till: plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org
Ämne: [plcs-dex] Reference Data Annotation Properties

Attempting to create reference data, and therefore to follow the
guidelines on development and the use of Dublin Core:

1) Where is the Status of a class recorded, and by who?
2) Is the last modified date always required, or only when it has been
modified after the initial creation?
3) Under source - where the data is new the source should be "PLCS RDL
n.n where n.n is the version of the reference data library in which the
RD first appeared" - how are we to determine this?
        - a: where is the RD library version identified?
        - b: if the current version is a.b, is the version of first
appearance a.b or a.(b+1)?
        - c: is this the version at the time of writing, or the version
at the time of uploading to sourceforge?

Given the list of subquestions under 3, I would suggest that this is
revised - possibly by deleting the requirement for "n.n", since we
already have the date.

Sean Barker
0117 302 8184

********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

DISCLAIMER: ***SECURITY LABEL: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED*** The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. This e-mail originates from LSC Group. Registered in England & Wales No 2275471 Registered Office: Devonport Royal Dockyard, Devonport, Plymouth, PL1 4SG

plcs-dex message