OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

plcs-dex message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [plcs-dex] Assigning location issue


Shouldn’t we use ‘/NULL’ for unknown values? Or is that just for text strings, and here we are talking about an rdl class?

Peter

 


From: Rob Bodington [mailto:rob.bodington@eurostep.com]
Sent: den 30 januari 2007 11:33
To: plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [plcs-dex] Assigning location issue

 

This came up before ….

[Tim Turner] I think this was because of the frequency with which the orignator of a location name may not be known. For example, how would I know who assigned the name "Peterborough" to that geographic location? 

 

I'm not averse to modifying it, but if we insist on the org.id etc., what values should people use if it is unknown? Well I guess we could say "Unknown". There's a lot of figs to update if we choose that route - although we could update the instantiation path & input parameters & leave the rest as part of an issue.

 

Why don't we adopt the convention that the identifier should be "unknown" if it is unknown.

There is already a class in plcs-proposed.owl

 

Arguably if we do that, we would not need assigning_identification_with_no_organization

 

Regards
Rob

-------------------------------------------   
Rob Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Web Page:
http://www.eurostep.com http://www.share-a-space.com
Email: Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Phone: +44 (0)1452 810 960 (note new number)
Mobile: +44 (0)7796 176 401

 


From: Rob Bodington [mailto:rob.bodington@eurostep.com]
Sent: 30 January 2007 09:37
To: plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [plcs-dex] Assigning location issue

 

Hi

I have just raised the following issue against assigning_location.

Any comments?

 

 

 

<issue

   id="RBN-4"

   type="general"

   status="open"

   category="minor_technical"

   by="Rob Bodington"

   date="07-01-30">

<description>

The template uses assigning_identification_with_no_organization to identify

the location. Given that the same location can be identified in different

ways by different organizations, I think that the identification should

be in the context of the organization. I.e. use assigning_identification

not assigning_identification_with_no_organization.

 

For example, the military may identify an airbase by a code, a manufacturer

may call it something else. Hence the location will have 2

identifiers, one given by the military, and one by the manufacturer. They

can only be distinguished if there organization that owns the identifier is provided.

 

Regards
Rob

-------------------------------------------   
Rob Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Web Page:
http://www.eurostep.com http://www.share-a-space.com
Email: Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Phone: +44 (0)1452 810 960 (note new number)
Mobile: +44 (0)7796 176 401

 

This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of Eurostep Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]