Tracker: PLCS Ref. data  :—Open Issues not reminded or considered

[Index] [Process] [All issues] [CCB issues]

Export date: 2012-12-02 03:07:21

Row Id Category Summary Details Priority Status Resolution Release Submitter Assignee Closer Date Raised Date Closed
1 3526623 Update OWL PLCS PSM defnitions to be terminological sound All PSM OWL classes need to be udpated to have the correct annotation properties, have no model specific details in them (e.g reference to attributes etc.) and have terminologically correct definition 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-05-14 04:02:56 1970-01-01 12:00:00
2 3527517 Create a separate OWL file for terminology Create a separate OWL file for terminology The URL should be: http://docs.oasis-open.org/plcs/plcs-terms-en.owl 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-05-17 08:09:03 1970-01-01 12:00:00
3 3579487 Context specific terms in OWL The terms.xml of each context should not be used. Separate context specific OWL files for storing context specific (non classifying) terms and their definitions is needed. File name should be; [context]-terms-[lang].owl. Until this is implemented, context specific terms should be stored in plcs-terms-[lang].owl, possibly with a translation in plcs-terms-en.owl. 3 Open None matsn nobody nobody 2012-10-23 12:53:07 1970-01-01 12:00:00
4 3581940 corrrect and complete owl classes under Activity Activity class has a number of subclasses in the reference data - These should be reviewed 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-30 04:07:57 1970-01-01 12:00:00
5 3581942 corrrect and complete owl classes under Property The hierarchy of owl classes under Property need to be reviewed and corrected 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-30 04:10:06 1970-01-01 12:00:00
6 3581950 corrrect and complete owl classes under LifeCycleStage The hierarchy of owl classes under LifeCycleStage ApplicationDomain need to be reviewed and corrected In particluar the class should be individuals 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-30 04:35:43 1970-01-01 12:00:00
7 3582132 corrrect and complete owl classes: Message The hierarchy of owl classes under Message need to be reviewed and corrected 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-31 07:13:27 1970-01-01 12:00:00
8 3582134 corrrect and complete owl classes: Location The hierarchy of owl classes under Locationneed to be reviewed and corrected 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-31 07:14:28 1970-01-01 12:00:00
9 3582135 corrrect and complete owl classes: Justification The hierarchy of owl classes under Justification need to be reviewed and corrected 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-31 07:14:43 1970-01-01 12:00:00
10 3582136 corrrect and complete owl classes: Observation The hierarchy of owl classes under Observation need to be reviewed and corrected 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-31 07:14:53 1970-01-01 12:00:00
11 3582137 corrrect and complete owl classes: State The hierarchy of owl classes under State need to be reviewed and corrected 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-31 07:18:16 1970-01-01 12:00:00
12 3582138 corrrect and complete owl classes: Condition The hierarchy of owl classes under Condition need to be reviewed and corrected 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-31 07:18:43 1970-01-01 12:00:00
13 3582139 corrrect and complete owl classes: Breakdown The hierarchy of owl classes under Breakdown need to be reviewed and corrected 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-31 07:19:15 1970-01-01 12:00:00
14 3582140 corrrect and complete owl classes: Resources The hierarchy of owl classes under Resources need to be reviewed and corrected 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-31 07:20:08 1970-01-01 12:00:00
15 3582142 corrrect and complete owl classes: ViewDefinitionUsage The hierarchy of owl classes under ViewDefinitionUsage need to be reviewed and corrected 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-31 07:21:04 1970-01-01 12:00:00
16 3582143 corrrect and complete owl classes: WorkRequest The hierarchy of owl classes under WorkRequestneed to be reviewed and corrected 5 Open None robbod nobody nobody 2012-10-31 07:21:29 1970-01-01 12:00:00
17 3587634 Review ref data created by Eurostep France Review ref data created by Eurostep France 5 Open None mikeward nobody nobody 2012-11-15 10:59:08 1970-01-01 12:00:00
18 3574152 quality of content PLCS-PSM should be translated into Swedish All PLCS-PSM classes that has a least reached status 'passed_review' should be translated. Specify which classes has been modified between each check-in in the comment field. 7 Open None matsn matsn nobody 2012-10-03 01:00:34 1970-01-01 12:00:00
19 3576603 quality of content change definition and comment for Approval from: formal record that confirms that something fulfills agreed criteria to: formal record thatof whether something fulfills or fails to fulfil agreed criteria 5 Open None mikeward nobody nobody 2012-10-12 07:51:15 1970-01-01 12:00:00
20 3577310 quality of content owl instances should have the correct annotations eg: <!-- http://docs.oasis-open.org/plcs/ns/plcslib/v1.0/data/contexts/OASIS/refdata/plcs-rdl#Unserviceable --> <owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="&plcs-rdl;Unserviceable"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="&plcs-rdl;Operational_state"/> <skos:prefLabel xml:lang="en">unserviceable</skos:prefLabel> <dc:date xml:lang="en">2012-10-15</dc:date> <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">instance of an {operational state http://docs.oasis-open.org/plcs/ns/plcslib/v1.0/data/contexts/OASIS/refdata/plcs-rdl#Operational_state} that indicates that an {product as individual http://docs.oasis-open.org/plcs/ns/plcslib/v1.0/data/plcs/plcs-psm/refdata/plcs-psm#Activity} is fit not for use and cannot be restored to fitness or is not economic to restore it to fitness</rdfs:comment> <dc:source xml:lang="en">PLCS OASIS</dc:source> <skos:changeNote xml:lang="en">[2012-06-13] Rob Bodington, Eurostep: Initial definition</skos:changeNote> <skos:changeNote xml:lang="en">[2012-10-15] Mike Ward, Eurostep: rdfs:comment and skos:prefLabel edited</skos:changeNote> <dc:creator xml:lang="en">Mike Ward, Eurostep</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Mike Ward, Eurostep</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Rob Bodington, Eurostep</dc:contributor> <dc:type xml:lang="en">ready_for_review</dc:type> <owl:versionInfo xml:lang="en">v1.00</owl:versionInfo> </owl:NamedIndividual> 5 Open None mikeward nobody nobody 2012-10-15 11:46:18 1970-01-01 12:00:00
21 3586751 quality of content labels should be improved labels should be improved 5 Open None mikeward nobody nobody 2012-11-13 05:14:17 1970-01-01 12:00:00
22 3587498 quality of content Fix statuses of ancestors whose status is too low The status of an OWL class can be created, in_work, ready_for_review, passed_review, approved, in_use, or cancelled. If a class has a specific status, the status of its ancestors should not be lower (ie earlier in this sequence). 5 Open None mikeward nobody nobody 2012-11-15 01:23:56 1970-01-01 12:00:00