Hi
One of the issues in the recent
debate about NSN and identification was the need for global
rules.
AP239 had several major technical
ballot comments against it complaining about the lack of global
rules.
This was one of the reasons for
Germany
initially voting NO.
One of the ballot comments was
about global rules enforcing what is already documented in the mapping
tables. This has been resolved.
The other comment is about the
lack of global rules in general.
We have also had a discussion
about the need to have some global rules in capabilities.
I agree with Per-Ake, think that
we need to be very careful about adding global rules as they can restrict
the use of the AP.
Having said that, I think that
there are a few areas where we will benefit from global rules in the AP as
opposed to the DEXs/capabilities.
E.g.
Any identification assignment
must have an organization assigned to it.
Any product_as_individual,
product_as_realised, product_as_planned, part, part_version (note the model
has changed!!!) must have at least one identification assigned to
it.
Note, I am not enforcing any
classification or anything, just enforcing an instantiation
template.
What do people think to having
such global rules in the AP as opposed to the
capabilities?
One reason at least is keeping
the bargain on changing the German No vote to a Yes.
Are there any other instantiation
templates that we want to enforce?
Regards
Rob
-------------------------------------------
Rob
Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Web
Page: http://www.eurostep.com
http://www.share-a-space.com
Email:
Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Phone: +44 (0)1454
270030
Mobile: +44
(0)7796 176 401