On behalf of Michael Willett and the PMRM co-editors, I want to thank PMRM TC members for their input into the draft specification, which has been adopted as
a Committee Specification Draft.
I would ask TC members at this stage to reach out to your external networks to share the draft and urge stakeholders to read it and – hopefully- begin using
it and providing informal feedback, even in its current form. I have spoken to a couple of people who have said they have already found the draft useful.
The next stage is to discuss next steps, including the need for additions or changes, use cases, and when to begin seeking formal public comment as part of
the process for moving the draft to the level of Committee Specification. I am inserting the OASIS policies related to the formal public review process. How and when we proceed and next steps for publicizing the draft specification will be one of our agenda
items at the next PMRM TC meeting, scheduled for Thursday April 12 at 11AM ET.
Thanks again to you all for moving the work to this important stage.
John
3.2 Public Review of a Committee Draft
Before the TC can approve a Committee Specification Draft as a Committee Specification, or a Committee Note Draft as a Committee Note, the TC must conduct a public review of the work. The decision by the TC to submit
the draft for public review requires a Full Majority Vote, and must be accompanied by a recommendation from the TC of external stakeholders who should be notified of the review. The draft approved to go to review shall be called a Committee Specification Public
Review Draft or Committee Note Public Review Draft, as appropriate. The public review must be announced by the TC Administrator to the OASIS Membership list and optionally on other public mail lists; the TC Administrator shall at the same time issue a call
for IPR disclosure for Committee Specification Public Review Drafts.
Comments from non-TC Members must be collected via the TC's archived public comment facility; comments made through any other means (unless made by a TC Member via the TC email list) shall not be accepted. The TC must
acknowledge the receipt of each comment, track the comments received, and post to its primary e-mail list its disposition of each comment at the end of the review period.
No changes may be made to the public review draft during a review. If the TC decides by Full Majority Vote that changes are required, the draft shall be withdrawn from review after the Chair informs the TC Administrator,
and then subsequently resubmitted by the TC for a new Public Review cycle of the same type, either initial or subsequent.
The TC may conduct any number of review cycles (e.g. approval to send a Committee Specification Draft to public review, collecting comments, making edits to the Committee Specification Draft, etc.). The initial public
review of a public review draft must take place for a minimum of 30 days, and any subsequent reviews must be held for a minimum of 15 days. Changes made to a committee draft after a review must be clearly identified in any subsequent review, and the subsequent
review shall be limited in scope to changes made in the previous review. Before starting another review cycle the revisions must be re-approved as a Committee Specification Draft or Committee Note Draft, as appropriate, and then approved to go to public review
by the TC.
If any changes are made to the draft after the public review, whether as a result of public review comments or from TC Member input, then the TC must conduct another review cycle. The draft may not be considered for approval
by the TC as a Committee Specification or Committee Note until it has undergone a review cycle during which it has received no comments that result in any changes.
John Sabo
CA Technologies
Director, Global Government Relations
Tel: +1 202-513-6304
Mobile: +1 443-629-6198
john.t.sabo@ca.com
From: pmrm@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:pmrm@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Peter F Brown
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 9:34 AM
To: pmrm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [pmrm] Groups - Ballot closed: "Motion for approval of PMRM Working Draft 04 as a Committee Specification Draft"
Yea!
;-)
From: workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of tc_admin@oasis-open.org
Sent: Monday, 26 March, 2012 04:39
To: Peter F Brown
Subject: [pmrm] Groups - Ballot closed: "Motion for approval of PMRM Working Draft 04 as a Committee Specification Draft"
"Motion for approval of PMRM Working Draft 04 as a Committee Specification Draft" has closed.
|
Ballot Title:
Motion for approval of PMRM Working Draft 04 as a Committee Specification Draft
Group: OASIS Privacy Management Reference Model (PMRM) TC
Referenced Items
|
