[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Public Comment
Comment from: Trevor.Yann@ca.com I am a little confused about the StatusRequest element. The 1.0 spec states that the "execution" attribute MUST NOT be "synchronous". Is this a typo? It doesn't make sense for a StatusRequest to be asynchronous, as this implies that you might issue another StatusRequest to determine the result of the previous Statusrequest. The default value for the "execution" attribute IS "synchronous", so not specifying the "execution" attribute is the same as specifying "synchronous". This is inconsistent with the wording in the SPML 1.0 specification.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]