Logistics
Roll-call
Other Business
Business In Order
Action Items & Motions
References
|
Meeting Date |
09/30/2002 |
|
Meeting Time |
12:00 pm CDT |
|
Location |
Dial-in Number: 888-742-8686 |
|
Duration |
1 Hour |
|
Chair |
Darran Rolls |
|
Recording Secretary |
Gavenraj Sodhi |
|
Agenda |
As published as of September 30th, 2002 |
Present
|
|
|
|
(GS) |
Gavenraj Sodhi, Business Layers
|
|
(YK) |
Yoav Kirsch, Business Layers
|
|
(HL) |
Hal Lockhart, Entegrity Solutions
|
|
(JB) |
Jeff Bohren, OpenNetwork Technologies
|
|
(CS) |
Cliff Schmidt, Microsoft
|
|
(DR) |
Darran Rolls, Waveset
|
|
(MP) |
Mike Polan, IBM Canada
|
|
(TM) |
Tim Moses, Entrust
|
|
(ML) |
Matthias Leibmann, Microsoft
|
|
(JB) |
James Booth Microsoft |
|
None |
|
|
1 |
Motion to accept minutes of committee meeting 08/19/2002 |
|
DR |
Minutes
available [1]. - Approved |
|
2 |
Update |
|
DR |
Where are we on core specification development? Proposal for joint development initiatives. |
|
3 |
F2F |
|
DR |
What are the dates? End of October (29, 30), beginning of November (5,6 & 12, 13)Location: Redmond, WA |
|
4 |
Core Identity Schema |
|
DR |
Discuss need for a core identity schema. Overview of that’s out there. Suggestions/champions for investigation. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/provision/docs/SPMLCoreIdentitySchema.ppt |
|
5 |
Core Identity Schema Discussion |
|
DR |
Develop
small subgroup to develop an implementation as a core point of discussion
over the next four weeks. - Waveset steps up -
Business Layers steps up |
|
|
Core
Identity Schema -
Core identifier YK - For
the User object in the requirements, we should decide what class we should
use. No need of identity
schema. (WILL BE PLACED ON
ISSUES LIST) JB -
Agrees with representation of user as long as it is a recommendation Mike (IBM)
- Leave it open as to what Identity standard to be able to use DR - Any
other identity standards we did not list? Microsoft
- RSC from DSML may be useful to look at. YK - No
concept of user in Virtual ID from Use Cases Hal -
Doesn't understand the difference between user and account. YK -
Attribute of user holding the service JB - Use
Case 1 & 2 required Identity Schema (line 31) -
Giving user account data -
We have to recognize that people have to extend beyond recommending an
identity schema DR - we
should look at the RFC2251 (INetOrgPerson) schema Grp -
Let's pick up something and move forward |
|
6 |
Motion to Adjourn |
|
DR |
Meeting adjourned at 12:47 a.m. CT to re convene Monday, October 14th, 2002 at 12 noon CDT |
|
|
Owner |
Action Item |
|
1 |
DR |
Champion submission of an “SPML based on SAML” proposal. |
|
2 |
Mike (IBM) |
Aggregated service use case. |
|
3 |
GW/TG |
Statement clearly articulating Identity issue |
|
4 |
GS |
ADPr Basis of Discussion |
|
|
Motions |
|
|
|
Motion to adjourn |
Accepted |
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/provision/minutes/pstc-minutes-08192002.html