Logistics
Roll-call
Other Business
Business In Order
Action Items & Motions
References
|
Meeting Date |
03/03/2003 |
|
Meeting Time |
10:00 pm CDT |
|
Location |
Dial-in Number: 888-742-8686 /
303-928-2600 (Outside of the United States/Canada) |
|
Duration |
1 Hour |
|
Chair |
Darran Rolls |
|
Recording Secretary |
Gavenraj Sodhi |
|
Agenda |
As published as of March 3rd, 2003 |
Present
|
(GS) |
Gavenraj Sodhi, Business Layers
|
|
(AR) |
Archie Reed, Critical Path |
|
(JF) |
Jesus Fernandez, Computer Associates |
|
(HL) |
Hal Lockhart, Entrust |
|
(DR) |
Darran Rolls, Waveset |
|
(JB) |
Jeff Bohren, OpenNetworks |
|
(SA) |
Steve Anderson, OpenNetworks |
|
(PM) |
Paul Madsen, Entrust |
|
(GW) |
Gerry Woods, IBM |
|
(RE) |
Rami Elron, BMC |
|
(DC) |
Doron Cohen, BMC |
|
None |
|
|
1 |
Vote to minutes of committee meeting 02/24/2003 |
|
DR |
Minutes available at [1] – Approved |
Proposed Agenda
===============
3 - 10:10 Batch or single request
---------------------------------
Relating to Conrad's recent mail at [2].
Should the committee consider moving from
a batch to a single request model? Conrad (if on call) to present his views on this matter.
Discuss/resolve.
Action: Will keep on issues list.
Comment: JB – Do we have an issues list? - Volunteers to track Issues List
Will place item on issues list.
Will create resolution document.
4 - 10:12 Re-use in SPML thread
---------------------------------
Over the long discussion starting at [3], I
believe we have the
following motions to consider:
4.3 Exclusive use of xsd types to define/describe attributes
Comment: How would it look like?
Comment: Not enough comments coming from the group on the expressiveness of the schema for attributes.
Comment: JB to work with GW to come up with concrete proposal (message sequence, what schema would look like, …)
Comment: GW recommends that we come to conclusion by next week
Action: GW to post sample scenario
Comment: JB needs to have a scalable approach for it to be supportable
4.4 Issue based on 4.3 mean that we should get rid of the DSML filter mechanism too? (Part of 4.3)
5 - 10:22 WSDL & SPML
---------------------
Continue discussion on WSDL. Is this an issue
for the SOAP/HTTP binding
or does it have wider relevance to the core
protocol (as defined so
far)?
Comment: GW suggests WSDL would be inherent part of approach. May be appendix as approach of specification
Comment: Take a look at Jeff’s approach but let’s keep it separate and then put it on the cycle of resolution.
Action: JeffB to take over the SOAP Binding document and put it across to the list.
6 - 11:00 Motion to Adjourn
---------------------------
To reconvene 3/10/2003. – Accepted 8:36 a.m.
[1]
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/provision/minutes/pstc-minutes-02242003.html
[2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/provision/200302/msg00070.html
[3] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/provision/200302/msg00063.html