[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [provision] SPML identifier issues for the interop ...
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Boyce [mailto:kevin.boyce@entrust.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:56 PM
To: Jeff Bohren; provision@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [provision] SPML identifier issues for the interop ...it would be nice if the RA generated unique ids for the duration of the demo but since we are not supporting status or any other requests for the interop, it should not functionally matter-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Bohren [mailto:jbohren@opennetwork.com]
Sent: June 11, 2003 12:59 PM
To: provision@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [provision] SPML identifier issues for the interop ...For the interop we are using the SPML add request where the identifier is specified. Therefor the RA must ensure that the specified identifier is unique. In the examples in the interop spec the GUID identifier type is used with the user's CN as the guid. Obviously the CN is not guaranteed to be unique. I would suggest that we either use the email identifier (would require users to enter their real email) or we use the GUID identifier with an autogenerated GUID.Jeff BohrenProduct ArchitectOpenNetwork Technologies, Inc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]