[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: XPath support: define in spec or in profile?
The SPMLv2 protocol is rather generic, in that it is intended to support at least two bindings (SPML 1.0 or "DSML profile" and XML Schema or "XSD profile"). As I understand it, the requirement that a provider support XPath expressions (as well as any limitation to that required support) applies only to the XSD profile. 1) Do others agree? What of other possible profiles, such as (for example) an HR-XML profile? 2) If XPath support applies only to the XSD profile, should the main spec define the requirement for XPath support? Or should the main spec simply mention XPath as one *example* of a language in which a value of SelectType#path might be expressed? Gary
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]