[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [provision] Request/response element pairs.
Gary's approach seems reasonable to me. Jeff Bohren -----Original Message----- From: Gary P Cole [mailto:Gary.P.Cole@Sun.COM] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 2:33 PM To: PSTC Subject: [provision] Request/response element pairs. In today's conference call, Rami suggested that each request element should have a corresponding response element for reasons of clarity. During the conference call, Jeff Bohren objected that defining a new type (e.g., BulkModifyResponseType that extends spml:ResponseType but adds nothing) would be overkill. However, it occurs to me that we could add a new top-level element without defining a new type. For example, in the bulk capability where it declares: <element name="bulkDeleteRequest" type="spmlbulk:BulkDeleteRequestType" /> we could add: <element name="bulkDeleteResponse" type="spml:ResponseType" /> I believe that this would meet Rami's goals without defining an unnecessary type. Gary --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]