Re: [provision] SchemaType needs annotation.

[Gary P Cole <Gary.P.Cole@Sun.COM>]

Thanks, Jeff.  You're right of course that it should say 
"profile-specific schema definitions" rather than xsd:schema.

Bohren, Jeffrey wrote:

>I can put that in draft 25 (which I am finishing up now). But it should
>refer to "profile specific schema definitions" rather than xsd:schema.
>For instance it would be spmldsml:schema elements in the DSML Profile.
>
>Jeff Bohren
>BMC
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gary P Cole [mailto:Gary.P.Cole@Sun.COM] 
>Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 9:43 AM
>To: PSTC
>Subject: [provision] SchemaType needs annotation.
>
>SchemaType should have an annotation that describes its use of open 
>content for specified behavior. The annotation can be brief, but it 
>should get across the idea that an <spml:schema> may refer to an 
><xsd:schema> document or may contain an <xsd:schema> document as open 
>content.
>
>This instance deserves annotation because we rely on open content for 
>behavior that is specified in the protocol (rather than simply to allow 
>for behavior that is unspecified). 
>
>I'm also guided in this by the questions and issues raised by Kent 
>Spaulding, the developer working on our implementation for the Interop.
>
>Things that are unclear to him are likely to be unclear to others less 
>familiar with SPML2.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
>OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>  
>