[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] Core Components Issue: Representationof Aggregate Core Components]
Chiusano Joseph wrote: ><Quote7> >So BCC's and ASCC's are completely symmetrical. The registry should >consider both as properties of an ACC (with their own (U)uid's of >course). ></Quote7> > >Focusing on the (U)uid's comment: Would it be advantageous for an ASCC >to have its own UUID in the registry? If we represent ASCCs with >Associations, is this possible? > > > my vote: Yes and Yes. Associations *ARE* RegistryObjects and therefor have an id attribute. If we believe (as I do) that ASCC map naturally to an Association then it would have its own id and its own idenependent existince. This is how UML models and Association class. -- Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]