[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [Friendly Reminder] Re: [regrep-cc-review] Updated Requirements Mapping Document - Please Review
Just a friendly reminder of this request for review. Thanks, Joe Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > Team, > > Attached please find an updated version of our Requirements Mapping > document. If anyone has a chance, it would be great for us to take a > step back for a moment and review requirements [S1] to [S18] (inclusive > - please ignore [S19]-on for now). Feedback on these at this point will > be valuable, so that we don't get too far down the road and find out we > were on the wrong path for something. > > Some things to note please: > > (1) In many places, I've listed "We consider this requirement to be ..." > (middle column). These are places in which we have decided to handle a > certain aspect of the CCTS differently for the registry implementation - > for example, the fact that we are (currently) not treating Properties as > entities. So I've reworded the requirement to fit our current handling, > to make it easier for us. > > (2) In many places, I've also listed "This requirement can be ignored > for our purposes" (right column). These are places where - for example - > the handling of Properties is referenced, and there is nothing in the > particular requirement that we can implement in our registry > architecture per our current handling of Properties. This should whittle > down our requirements considerably. > > (3) In the middle column, I've also listed "We consider this requirement > to be the same as our interpretation of [XX], but from an inverse > perspective" in multiple places. These are places in which a requirment > states (paraphrasing for simplicity) "A BCC is contained within an ACC", > and then another requirement says "An ACC contains one or more BCCs". > I've marked the second occurrence of each of these as "This requirement > can be ignored for our purposes", since we've covered it on the first > occurrence. > > Thanks in advance for your feedback! > > Joe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Name: CC Review - REQUIREMENTS MAPPING.doc > CC Review - REQUIREMENTS MAPPING.doc Type: WINWORD File (application/msword) > Encoding: base64 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]