[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] UBL Result Paper of CC Implementation Verification
UBL LCSC, Comfort in numbers, perhaps: In reviewing this document, I noted at least one common concern that we (the OASIS/ebXML Registry TC Core Components Review Subcommittee) have had in our analysis of the CCTS spec. Referencing Proposal 10: <Quote> Use of Qualifiers for Object Class Terms and Property Terms More clarification in use of qualifiers for object class terms and property terms. Should the qualifier come from one of the context drivers only? </Quote> In the CCTS p.12 example with "ResidenceAddress. Details", we have questioned whether "Residence" results from one of the 8 context drivers (as it does not appear to). We asked the CCTS Team this question several weeks ago, and are anxiously awaiting a response. Therefore, we are currently considering "ResidenceAddress. Details" to be an ACC rather than an ABIE, because it does not appear to be associated with one of the 8 context categories. So in the Registry, we would allow a user to add an Object Class Qualifier of "Residence" to the ACC of "Address. Details", and the resulting ACC would considered to be "derived" from the "base" ACC of "Address. Details" (i.e. we would associate the 2 entities in the registry). Once the user classifies the ACC (whether it be "Address. Details" or "ResidenceAddress. Details") in the Registry according to one of the 8 context categories, an ABIE will result ("US_Address. Details" or "US_ResidenceAddress. Details"). We're at the point where we're starting to write our Technical Note, so unless we're made aware that "Residence" does indeed belong to one of the 8 context categories (and which one it is), we will consider it to be an ACC in our final deliverable. Kind Regards, Joe Chiusano Booz | Allen | Hamilton Chair, OASIS/Registry TC Core Components Review Subcommittee > "Stuhec, Gunther" wrote: > > Hello Allan, > > you'll find the results from the UBL LCSC of the CC implementation > verification process as an attached file. > > Kind regards, > > Gunther > > <<UBL Comments for Implementation Verification V1p0.doc>> > > Name: UBL Comments for > Implementation > Verification V1p0.doc > UBL Comments for Implementation Verification V1p0.doc Type: WINWORD File > (application/msword) > Encoding: base64 > Download Status: Not downloaded with > message > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgroup.php
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]