[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Does This Entity Make Sense?
I've been going though some combinations of Data Element Terms that are possible, and came across the following example: PurchaseOrder_Customer. Code My question is: Is this a valid entity according to the Core Components methodology? More details: - If we had an entity named "Customer. Code" (Property Term="Customer", Representation Term="Code"), according to CCTS it would not be considered a BCC because there is no Object Class. For our purposes, we may consider this a "Base BCC" from which BCCs are constructed. - The "PurchaseOrder" qualifier above is a Property Term Qualifier, not an Object Class Qualifier (because there is no Object Class) - which I believe makes this entity invalid according to CCTS (unless we considered it a "Base BBIE"?). But an entity named "PurchaseOrder_Document. Customer. Code" would be valid according to CCTS because it makes sense to have "PurchaseOrder" as an Object Class qualifier. Can anyone offer additional insight into this? Thanks, Joe
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]