[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Re: Methodology - OWL
Creating an Ontology for CCTS Artifacts would be nice goal that would incrementally build on the work thus far. I propose we start with an Owl-lite structure. <quote who="Farrukh Najmi"> > > > Carl Mattocks wrote: > >>OK - for me you have built the case that 'this sc is the best place to >> >> >>>define serialization (what comes back as the result of a registry query >>> >>> >>to "get()" a CC or BIE)'. >> > This is not all that thought but .... > > Would it make sense to define an OWL ontology to represent CCTS > artifacts such as CC or BIE. This would mean that the serialization > syntax would be OWL/RDF. > > Initially such CCTS artifacts in OWL/RDF syntax would be treated as > ExtrinsicObjects by the registry. > Later when the registry supports OWL/RDF natively they will add more > direct inference-based queries. > > -- > Regards, > Farrukh > -- Carl Mattocks CEO CHECKMi Operational Intelligence OEM ------------------------------- e-Business Agents Semantically Smart Compendiums ------------------------------- v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 www.CHECKMi.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]