[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Proposal for supporting Service and ServiceBinding
Sanjay,
I am concerned that in doing so we will explicitly overlap and repeat what
has been done in UDDI. I believe we ought to first resolve the issue on
positioning OASIS/ebXML Registry with UDDI, as suggested by Scott.
Regards, Dan
Metadata Management Technology and Standard
IBM DBTI for e-Business
Notes: Dan Chang/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS
Internet: dtchang@us.ibm.com
VM: IBMUSM50(DTCHANG)
Phone: (408)-463-2319
"Patil,
Sanjay" To: "'regrep-raws@lists.oasis-open.org'"
<SPatil@iona.c <regrep-raws@lists.oasis-open.org>
om> cc:
Subject: Proposal for supporting Service and ServiceBinding
09/04/01 03:05
PM
Here is a proposal for supporting Service and ServiceBinding objects
as first class object in the RIM.
<<SupportServiceAndServiceBinding.doc>>
In order to be readily useful, a registry needs to have inherent support
for
the commonly used business documents. Business Service interface and the
technical binding of these Business Service interfaces seem to be falling
in
such a category.
1. Providing inherent support for common business
documents.
2. Functionally complete in comparison with other
Registry
Standards
Please review the proposal and let us start discussing it over the mail
list.
thanks,
Sanjay Patil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
IONA
Total Business Integration (TM)
Phone: 408 350 9619 http://www.iona.com
(See attached file: SupportServiceAndServiceBinding.doc)
SupportServiceAndServiceBinding.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC