[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
Zachary Alexander wrote: >Farrukh, > >Why not have them join OASIS and the Reg/Rep TC? Individual membership >is a special class of OASIS membership setup for industry experts. > > > Believe me I recruits people to OASIS all the time. JUst ask Scott Mcgrath. But that is not acceptable in liaison situations IMO. >Zachary Alexander >The IT Investment Architect >ebTDesign LLC, (703) 283-4325 >http://www.ebTDesign.com | http://www.p2pspeaker.com >http://www.p2peconomy.com | http://www.itinvestmentvehicle.com > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] >Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:39 PM >To: Zachary Alexander >Cc: regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved > >Zachary Alexander wrote: > > > >>Farrukh, >> >>Does this mean the ebXML Registry SCM standard will no longer be an >>OASIS standard? Shouldn't this be put to a vote to the Reg/Rep TC? >> >> >> >Nothing changes other than the location and visibility of the documents. > > > >>Isn't >>this the same as saying that anyone can participate in the development >>of the OASIS Registry SCM standard regardless of membership in OASIS? >> >> >> >> >No not anyone. Only invited experts in SW community that we would be >liaisoning with. > >This is purely logistical move. It has no deeper meaning or intent. > > > >>Zachary Alexander >>The IT Investment Architect >>ebTDesign LLC, (703) 283-4325 >>http://www.ebTDesign.com | http://www.p2pspeaker.com >>http://www.p2peconomy.com | http://www.itinvestmentvehicle.com >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] >>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:17 AM >>To: regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved >> >> >>Team, >> >>We are moving the use case and scenario documents from KAVI to an >>external web site for the following reasons: >> >>-We need to share use cases with Semantic Web community at large >> >> >outside > > >>OASIS to get broad feedback. >>KAVI does not seem to allow that. >> >>-We need the URLs to our document tree to be user-defined (us). Notice >>how much more memorable they >>are in the new location. >> >>The new location for the use cases and scenarios documents is: >> >>http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/ebxmlrr-spec/scmsc/useCases >> >>The content is identical to what was last in KAVI except that I have >>changed the names of some files. >> >>You may soon see messages about deletion of KAVI version of these >> >> >files. > > >>Just ignore them. >> >>Recall that in our last meeting we had covered user cases 3, 4 and 5. >> >>For our next meeting on Tues 2/24 at 1PM I propose we resume with >>discussion of use cases in the following order: >> >>5-9, 1, 2 >> >>Until then please study the use cases and share comments. Also feel >> >> >free > > >>to submit new use cases and scenarios using the template established >> >> >for > > >>the group. Thank you. >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]