Re: [regrep-semantic] PR2: Explicit support for OWL Ontology/Class inplace of ClassificationScheme / ClassificationNode

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>]

ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote:

>>Please confirm that the revised text for PR2 satisfies your concerns.
>>    
>>
>
>It does not.  In particular:
>    Allow use of an Ontology Class in ebXML Registry wherever we use
>    ClassificationNodes in Version 3.
>
>This does not address OWL properties or individuals.  This could be
>added as separate requirement which I could propose, if you prefer.
>  
>
Yes. I was thinking of properties and instances as separate PRs each ( 
look Zach no OWL ;-)  )

Please feel free to propose those 2. Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh