regrep-semantic message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: FW: Trip Report: Semantic Technologies Conference
- From: "Jeff Pollock" <Jeff.Pollock@networkinference.com>
- To: <regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:22:26 -0700
FYI...trip report from the semantic tech conference, a little skewed
towards NI interests. hope some find it interesting. there were
some very cool presentations, I will pass along links to them as the become available.
-Jeff-
The Good
- Attendance was pretty strong, I’d guess around 125
people
- SWAG on mix: 20% vendors, 20% end-users, 15% VCs, 15%
academic, 30% SIs
- Deb McGuinness’ keynote was great, it provided a balanced,
yet OWL/RDF-centric view of the evolving semantics space
- Trust and proof topics were discussed – alluding to internal
KSL work being done around trust models and query planning
- Note: I am curious here as to any overlap with OWL-S
activit
- The first panel series was focused on FOAF and RSS type
stuff, pretty interesting, but unfortunate that they were positioned as
“semantic technologies now” – because in many ways, the panel I was on (with
Contivo & Semantic Arts) had some much more near-term things to
say.
- I talked about Network Inference really liking “the boring
software problems” quietly focusing on areas like health care systems, supply
chain environments, logistics systems, chart of accounts resolution, and
net-centric warfare, while leaving the “exciting” mass-consumer semantic web
to others.
- I also elaborated on the core value proposition for semantic
technologies: fewer humans, more automation and adaptivness
- My talk centered on semantic use cases for the enterprise,
calling specific attention to why OWL matters in those use cases
- Peter Norvig’s talk on Google’s conception of “bottom-up”
semantics – inferring axioms from patterns of search engine hits (water runs
downhill because there are more references to that than water running uphill)
– was an interesting talk.
- The later panel included a set of VCs discussing why they
have made investments in a particular space.
- BoA, who represents Contivo, took a strong position that
they don’t bet on technology, they bet on the business problem that is being
solved
- Palomar, who represents NI, took a strong position that
they believe in betting on technology that solves major systemic
pain-points
- Both agreeing that other factors (mgmt, maturity,
customers, etc.) are crucial as well
- The PARC conference center is a very nice facility, highly
recommend it to anyone
The Bad
- Guha, of IBM, had to cancel at the last minute due to family
problems
- I got cut short due to the previous three speakers
taking a little more than their
allotted time
- The conference was geared towards “the middle ground” –
which meant it was not extremely useful for any one audience – Dave Hollander and I both agreed that it would have
been more fun to spend the day talking with people about what they think
semantics are
The Ugly
- My hotel over-booked and bumped me out and over to a Motel
6
- PARC is located in the middle of a cow patch,
mmooooo!
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]