[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Re XML.org implementation
At 02:51 PM 4/2/00 , Terry replied to Nagwa: >Nagwa wrote: >| There are two things I would like to report to the regrep TC from the last >| XML.org meeting: >| First, The terminology used in Registration Status List ("certified" and >| "standardized") needs to be modified (due to legal risks). > >Those were the values from 11179. In fact, the values should be >chosen by the RA, so we shouldn't specify anything. I'll replace >that list with CDATA. I agree with others that the existing registration-status-list is not very helpful, but I'd hate to see it become entirely specific to the proprietary uses of the Registration Authority. There might be some very valuable "status" states that should be defined in the OASIS specification and presented to the public by Registration Authorities. The existing registration-status-list is as follows: certified recorded standardized submitted-for-certification And the existing administrative-status-list is: received rejected retired-by-registration-authority retired-by-submitting-organization withdrawn-by-submitting-organization I think that the last three items in the Administrative list are really appropriate to be used for the registered item. Once an item is registered and available to the public, its metadata shouldn't just be deleted when the item itself is no longer valid. Instead, it the metadata should label the item as expired, or withdrawn, etc. Most of the above labels are assigned by the Registration Authority, so in most cases they shouldn't be used by a Submitting Organization when a <data-element> is first submitted for registration; however they might be used by one RA when submitting <data-element>s to a second RA. I think a more meaningful status-list for OASIS purposes might be a combination of the above two lists that can be used by the SO and RA as follows: submitted -- Used by SO when making submission to RA received -- Used by RA for internal purposes only rejected -- Used by RA for internal purposes only registered -- Used by RA for public viewing when item accepted validated -- Used by RA if item "uses" a DTD/Schema and is validated to it retired-by-so -- Used by RA if expiry date passes with no revision from SO retired-by-ra -- Used by RA on its own initiative withdrawn -- Used by RA after explicit request from SO It seems to me that no two of these values would ever be used simultaneously by the same registry, i.e. validated implies registered and registered implies not validatable or not yet validated, so they could comprise one "oasis-status-list". I expect that the metadata for items labeled as "retired" or "withdrawn" would actually stay in the registry for some period of time, much after the item itself is deleted from the repository. -- Len ************************************************************** Len Gallagher LGallagher@nist.gov NIST Work: 301-975-3251 Bldg 820 Room 562 Home: 301-424-1928 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970 USA Fax: 301-948-6213 **************************************************************
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC