[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: ebXML and UDDI
Hi Joel, > A fundamental difference is that UDDI is a Registry only > where ebXML offers > both Registry and Repository functionality. Yes, the ebXML registry acts as an index for things stored in the repository. However, the document (http://www.ebxml.org/specs/rrUDDI.pdf) in addition to talking about storing information about reg/reps UDDI Business Registry, also says- " 6.1 ... tModels for ebXML Core Components, CPPs, Business Process Definitions, etc. could also be supported by UDDI operators as Canonical tModels. " This statement puzzled me. If the intent is to use UDDI to find a reg/rep; then it should be sufficient to have a tModel for reg/rep. Why do we need tModels for things that are stored in the repository- can't users first find the ebXML reg/rep using UDDI API, and then interact with it to get the CPPs etc.? Or is the intent here that UDDI could *possibly* be used in place of a ebXML registry to index things stored in a ebXML repository? - Vivek > In my humble opinion, the primary reason for a bridging the two in a > complementary Use Case model is to provide global visibility of ebXML > Registries. Registering ebXML registries within UDDI would > enable that > "global" discovery. > > Joel > > -----Original Message----- > From: CHOPRA,VIVEK (Non-HP-Cupertino,ex1) > [mailto:vivek_chopra2@non.hp.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:47 AM > To: 'regrep@lists.oasis-open.org' > Subject: ebXML and UDDI > > > I was reading the ebXML reg/rep white paper on using UDDI to find an > ebXML reg/rep (http://www.ebxml.org/specs/rrUDDI.pdf), and had a > couple of questions: > > 1. Have canonical UDDI tModels been defined for reg/reps, > CPPs etc. as > suggested in this document? > > 2. If there is a move to define tModels for things that are stored > in a ebXML repository (e.g. CPPs, schemas etc.) does it make > sense to use a UDDI registry in place of an ebXML registry? Or > are there some things that the UDDI registry can not do that > is required from an ebXML registry? If so, are are proposals > that would bring the UDDI and ebXML registries closer in intent > and functionality? > > Any pointers would be appreciated! Thanks, > > - Vivek > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: regrep-request@lists.oasis-open.org > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: regrep-request@lists.oasis-open.org >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC