[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep] Result of Query Ballot
Dan, Karl, and Others, There's no reason to let this single vote be the cause of undue friction among TC members. I'm OK with the vote -- the proposal, as written, did not pass. The proposal did have some embedded issues that may have confused the non-voters. Let's resolve the issues in next week's F2F and then vote on a revised proposal at the F2F. -- Len At 02:39 PM 10/24/01, Dan Chang wrote: >Karl, > >Do you agree that the vote count should be Invalid and not Disapprove and >therefore there should be a re-vote, as David and Scott have suggested? > >The Query team, especially Len, has put in a lot of effort in developing >the Query Proposal. It is totally inappropriate to be disapproved by >non-votes. As David has indicated, one of those non-votes actually would >have been an Approve vote. Also, most seriously, as I have pointed out, the >existing Object Query Management Service chapter is outdated and incorrect >and cannot be included as is in V2. > >Regards, Dan > >Metadata Management Technology and Standard >IBM DBTI for e-Business >Notes: Dan Chang/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS >Internet: dtchang@us.ibm.com >VM: IBMUSM50(DTCHANG) >Phone: (408)-463-2319 > > > > > "Karl F. > Best" > <karl.best@oasis To: Dan Chang/Santa > Teresa/IBM@IBMUS > -open.org> cc: Lisa Carnahan > <lisa.carnahan@nist.gov>, > regrep@lists.oasis-open.org > > 10/24/01 11:16 Subject: RE: [regrep] > Result of Query Ballot > AM > > > > ************************************************************** Len Gallagher LGallagher@nist.gov NIST Work: 301-975-3251 Bldg 820 Room 562 Home: 301-424-1928 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970 USA Fax: 301-948-6213 **************************************************************
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC