[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] RE: Updated ROWS proposal ...
Message text written by Dan Chang > Joel, I agree with your objections to this proposal. It is strange and non-uniform to make ebXML Registry a general purpose registry AND a business service registry. I am also deeply concerned that this proposal explicitly duplicates/overlaps UDDI functionality. I believe the industry is better served with a single set of complementary and consistent specifications rather than with multiple specifications having duplicate/overlapping functionality. Regards, Dan< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan, The two teams are focused on different peices (or should be). Problem is - we've not actually demarced this - or set in place a true collaboration committee or working mechanisms. We asked for this six months ago, we asked for it a year ago when UDDI was launched. If you don;t build a bridge, then two towns will develop on separate sides of the river. Its a classic situation. It would be excellent if IBM could lead a go forward plan here, but I'm not sure there is any incentive to do this right now. It appears to me there are now lukewarm bridge building analysis in place - which states the cost of building the bridge is not worth the returns or benefits and would take resources away from building other more needed pieces in the short-term. All makes sense to me. But I expect these metrics could change soon - so be prepared to re-assess when they do. Thanks, DW.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC