RE: [regrep] Forwarding Ballot

[Anne Fischer <anne@drummondgroup.com>]

Based on the changes that I completed this evening, my "comfort" level with this document has gone up considerably.  If it is not too late (or early ...hmm....), I would like to change my vote to Approve.

 

The only major change that has not been made (and will not be made this week) is consolidating Section 8.2.2.

 

-Anne

-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Fischer [mailto:anne@drummondgroup.com]
Sent: December 04, 2001 6:58 PM
To: Regrep
Subject: FW: [regrep] Forwarding Ballot

All,

I "Reply" instead of "Reply to All"

-Anne

-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Fischer [mailto:anne@drummondgroup.com]
Sent: December 04, 2001 3:16 PM
To: Lisa Carnahan
Subject: RE: [regrep] Forwarding Ballot

Disapprove.

 

I have been busy editing RS and have not had an opportunity to actually read the documents.  I know that there is a section in Query that would be better served by some condensing as Nikola has suggested to me.  I would am not convinced that we have dotted our i's and crossed our t's on this document.  My comfort level is not where it needs to be to send it on to OASIS.  However, I am but one vote.

 

-Anne

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Carnahan [mailto:lisa.carnahan@nist.gov]
Sent: November 30, 2001 6:48 AM
To: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [regrep] Forwarding Ballot

Ballot name: Forwarding Specifications

Ballot statement: "If both the OASIS/ebXML Registry Services Specification, v1.08 and the OASIS/ebXML Registry Information Model, v1.12 are approved by the OASIS/ebXML Registry Technical Committee, then both documents should be put forward for an OASIS membership ballot according to Section 2, Standards Process defined at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.shtml ."

Please indicate whether you approve, disapprove or abstain with the action delineated in above statement.  Please send your vote directly to the Registry TC list by December 5.

--lisa