[regrep] minutes of last meeting

[Lisa Carnahan <lisa.carnahan@nist.gov>]

Minutes of the OASIS/ebXML Registry Technical Committee Meeting
Conference Call - February 21

Attendees:
Lisa Carnahan, NIST
Suresh Damodaran Sterling Commerce
Mike DeNicola Fujitsu
Anne Fischer Drummond Group
Sally Fuger Individual Member
Farrukh Najmi Sun Microsystems
Joel Neu Vitria Technologies
Sanjay Patil IONA
Neal Smith Individual Member
Nikola Stojanovic Individual Member

1. CC Review Update - the CC Review Subteam is continuing its work in 
pulling out the registry requirements/expectations from the CC Technical 
Specification.  The Subteam is developing a table that defines each 
requirement.  For each requirement the subteam is further defining how the 
V2 RIM/RS satisfies the requirement, or indicates if the specs do not 
satisfy the requirement.  Currently the Subteam does not see any 
'showstoppers'.  The Subteam meets the Wednesday (2:00 Eastern) prior to 
the TC meeting on Thursday.

2. Method for handling public comments - The TC developed a method for 
handling public comments regarding the V2 RIM/RS.  (As of the meeting, 
there had been only one set of comments.)  Comments will be resolved by a 
subteam of TC members using a mailing list.  Initial volunteers for the 
subteam are Nikola, Farrukh and Sanjay.  Farrukh volunteered to identify 
the comments and uniquely number them. (Duane's comments came via our 
regular mailing list, rather than the official comment list - therefor, we 
need to be sure to formally identify comments from all sources.)

3, V3 Priorities - The team reviewed the list of candidate items for V3 
work.  Neil Smith will make (has made?) the agreed changes to the 
list.  Most of the changes were either renaming changes or consolidation 
changes.  The following members listed their priorities/interests based on 
the list (prior to any changes):
Farrukh - 12, 7, 18, 5, 8
Nikola - 11
Sanjay - 10, 6, 15
Lisa and Sally - 3

Anyone else with an opinion regarding priorities should send email to the list.

3. Criteria for determining V3 Work items - The TC discussed some 
subjective criteria that we should use in discussing our priorities of work 
items.  The following list was developed: (no implied relevance to order)
-Maturity of base specifications on which our specifications may rely.
-Ease in which the item may be addressed given the V2 specs (low lying fruit)
-Level of effort required versus payoff of addressing
-The Use case for the item
-Level of interest by TC members to address item

4. We will be discussing (and hopefully) making initial decisions regarding 
our top items at the next conference call.  Our goal is to have initial 
proposals done by April 15.

5 Next conference call is Thursday, March 7th.