OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: [regrep] RE: [regrep-cooperating] V2 Spec Issues w/ WSDL Files


Farrukh,

The "xsd" namespace declaration change that you have added looks fine.  Yes,
I AGREE this should go into an Errata of some kind prior to the Oasis vote.
I will test this new version if/when I get some time.

Let me make this perfectly clear, I DO NOT disagree on including version
information, I AGREE that version attribute within the two wsdl files is
appropriate.  As I said in my private reply to you last night, I believe
that a version attribute may/should be added to the wsdl files within the
headers.  I may be wrong but that is how I do it that way within *.xsd XML
schema files.  Does anyone on these lists know if a version attribute is
allowed in WSDL files?  

I DO NOT agree that it is appropriate to continue to include a CVS version
stamp attribute.  In the future, tools other than CVS may be used by other
editors.

Joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:13 AM
To: Munter, Joel D
Cc: 'Oasis Registry TC'; 'Oasis Cooperating Registries'
Subject: Re: [regrep-cooperating] RE: [regrep] V2 Spec Issues w/ WSDL
Files


Joel,

Attached is a revised version of the Registry.xsd file. Please run your
validator on it and let me know if Issue number 157 is addressed.
Also please look at the change to the documentation element which takes out
all
but the file revision number. I feel that a file revision
that is automatically updated on file changes is important even in a
normative
file. I see no down side to it. I realize that you disagree.
I would like others to comment on the way I propose we address Issue 158 as
shown in attached file (See $Revision).

Thanks again for your help.

--
Regards,
Farrukh


"Munter, Joel D" wrote:

> Farrukh,
>
> You are in fact using xsd1 for something entirely different.
>
> Within registry.wsdl, you have the following already defined:
>         xmlns:xsd1="urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep:registry:xsd:2.0"
>
> Please separate the CVS comment from the XSD one.  Albeit, one was
trivial,
> there were two issues here.
>
> Joel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:26 PM
> To: Munter, Joel D
> Cc: 'Oasis Registry TC'; 'Oasis Cooperating Registries'
> Subject: Re: [regrep] V2 Spec Issues w/ WSDL Files
>
> Joel,
>
> You are correct. The declaration declares xsd1 as the namespace prefix but
a
> couple of places use xsd instead of xsd1.
> I have logged a new issue as follows:
>
> issue_num: 157
> creation_date: 3/11/2002
> category: WSDL
> Priority: 1
> is_resolved: No
> description: Registry.xsd does not declare namespace xsd but has
refeernces
> to
> it. Need to remove CVS comment.
> resolution:
> general_notes
> reported_version: CVS v 1.14
> is_closed: No
> resolution_version:
>
> Thanks for finding this. We need to start an errata document to document
and
> communicate issues like this. Lets make that a topic
> for next team meeting.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
> "Munter, Joel D" wrote:
>
> > V2 Spec ISSUE 1) I am doing some validation of the V2 spec material and
> > tested the SOAPBinding WSDL file with a good validator.  Here is the
error
> > that I received.
> >
> > <WsdlResults xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> > xmlns="http://microsoft.com/net/wsdlverify">
> > 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234
> >          1         2         3         4         5         6
> >         <StandardOutput>Microsoft (R) Web Services Description
> >                 Language Utility [Microsoft (R) .NET Framework,
> >                 Version 1.0.3612.0] Copyright (C) Microsoft
> >                 Corporation 1998-2001. All rights reserved.
> >                 If you would like more help, please type "wsdl /?".
> >         </StandardOutput>
> >         <ErrorOutput>Error: There was an error processing
> >
>
'http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/documents/2.0/services/Registry
> > SOAPBinding.wsdl'.
> >                 - The document was understood, but it could
> >                   not be processed.
> >                 - The WSDL document contains links that could
> >                   not be resolved.
> >                 - There is an error in XML document (21, 26).
> >                 - Namespace prefix 'xsd' is not defined.
> >         </ErrorOutput>
> >         <ErrorHints>I was unable to diagnose why this WSDL
> >                 didn't work. You may want to verify that you
> >                 are using the 2001 XSD Schema (although this
> >                 isn't required by the WSDL spec, it is the
> >                 only schema version supported by many SOAP
> >                 SDKs.
> >         </ErrorHints>
> > </WsdlResults>
> >
> > The problem is that "xsd:" is referenced within the registry.wsdl but
the
> > xsd namespace is never properly declared within the header of either
file.
> >
> > e.g., the following which occurs several times with Registry.wsdl fails:
> >         <part name="content" type="xsd:any"/>
> > The fix is to declare the xsd namespace within the header.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > V2 Spec Issue 2) Even though some of this is a comment, we should remove
> the
> > following also.
> >
> > <!--xmlns:xsi = "http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema-instance"
> > xsi:schemaLocation = "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/
> > file:///C:/jsews/ebxmlrr-spec/misc/schema/wsdl.xsd"-->
> >
> > <documentation>$Header:
> > /cvsroot/ebxmlrr/ebxmlrr-spec/misc/services/RegistrySOAPBinding.wsdl,v
> 1.14
> > 2001/12/02 15:59:11 farrukh_najmi Exp $
> > This is the the normative concrete SOAP/HTTP binding for the OASIS ebXML
> > Registry services.</documentation>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Joel Munter
> > Distributed Systems, Intel Labs
> > joel.d.munter@intel.com
> > (480) 552-3076
> > (602) 790-0924 (cell)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC