RE: [regrep] another bug with Registry.wsdl

[David RR Webber - XMLGlobal <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Message text written by "Breininger, Kathryn R"
> 
We just all voted on the v2.1 versions of both documents.  At some point we
need to post what we have done (because meanwhile, the other typos, etc.
are
not being addressed in a document that is available for people trying to
use
the specs).  Do we keep postponing this?  Do we post v2.1, and gather any
additional fixes for a v2.2, which would also need to be voted on prior to
posting?  This re-emphasizes that we need to be very thorough in our
analysis and testing, not only of the document itself, but also the files
associated with them, prior to voting and posting.    
<<<<

Kathryn - it also re-emphasizes there SHOULD be a simple means
to make typo-fixes to documents - other than forcing a complete
re-submission and vote.

I've proposed to OASIS they change the procedures to allow
typo-correction.   To ensure safe guards we'd document these
as an addendum of changes made since the publish for vote,
and then have an additional vote (requiring 2/3rds) on those
change fixes - and then lock the document.

Nothing is perfect - but at least we can help ourselves here.

We just need to avoid that Senate thing - where a bill for
adoption of parentless children has a $200 billion line item
added to purchase Texas - etc....

DW.