[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from Santa Fe
It hasn't been published yet. But you can find the draft in the uddi-spec discussion list archives. > -----Original Message----- > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:55 PM > To: Munter Joel D > Cc: Matthew MacKenzie; Anne Thomas Manes; Max Voskob; Still Erik R; > OASIS regrep > Subject: Re: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from Santa > Fe > > > Thanks Joel. The only technical note I see published on the UDDI site > is "Providing a Taxonomy for Use in UDDI Version 2". Is there a URL > available for the technical note your refer to? > > Joe > > "Munter, Joel D" wrote: > > > > Seeing ebXML based services "registered" in a UDDI registry > > (semi-private or the public UBR) and therefore discoverable in a demo > > may go a long way toward eliminating some confusion. > > > > The Technical note being drafted by Kibakura-san (Fujitsu) and being > > discussed on the UDDI-spec dist list has come along way. I recommend > > that you all read this and comment as you need to. > > > > Joel Munter, Intel > > desk: 480.552.3076 > > cell: 602.790.0924 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:13 AM > > To: Matthew MacKenzie > > Cc: Anne Thomas Manes; Max Voskob; Still Erik R; OASIS regrep > > Subject: Re: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from Santa > > Fe > > > > One way to help remedy this perception might be to present on > > "Registering Web Services in an ebXML Registry" at some of the Web > > services conferences, such as Web Services One. > > > > Some other things that might help are the Best Practices paper on > > registering Web services in an ebXML Registry (currently in progress), > > and perhaps in the future a high-level mapping between the 2 registry > > architectures (such as "ebXML Registry Classification is *roughly* > > equivalent to UDDI categoryBag", "ebXML Organization is *roughly* > > equivalent to UDDI businessEntity", etc.) > > > > Joe > > > > Matthew MacKenzie wrote: > > > > > > Anne, > > > > > > You're right on. ebXML != Web Services, at least not general > > > perception wise. I'd like to see that changed somewhat, ebXML > > > messaging is web services based, and ebXML registry is a web service. > > > > > > On Thursday, Jan 30, 2003, at 07:40 America/Vancouver, Anne Thomas > > > Manes wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I think RegRep's biggest issue is that it's so closely associated > > with > > > > ebXML, and when most people think of Web services, they think of > > SOAP, > > > > not > > > > ebXML. Likewise, when they think of a Web services registry, they > > > > think of > > > > UDDI. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC